Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Prog Urol ; 32(12): 843-848, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35654718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For patients with cT1 renal lesions, Partial Nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard treatment. However, 20% of small renal masses are benign, situation in which the PN is an overtreatment. The percutaneous Renal Tumor Biopsy (RTB) may lower the risk of overtreatment as there is a 90% concordance rate on histotype between the RTB and the final pathology. It has been suggested that the RTB could increase the difficulty of the PN and increase the risk of surgical complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes and complications of PN with or without previous RTB. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: monocentric retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted PN between January 2012 and December 2019. MEASUREMENTS: perioperative complications were recorded using Clavien-Dindo classification, peroperative data included operative time, clamping time and blood loss, and histological outcomes of RTB and PN. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 163 patients were included in our study. There were significantly less benign lesions in PN with prior RTB: 7% (4/56) vs. 20% (22/107) without prior RTB (P=0.03). There were no significant differences regarding Clavien-Dindo>2 perioperative complications with respectively 7% (4/56) vs. 10% (11/107) (P=0.57). Same goes for peroperative data such as duration of surgery (P=0.81), warm ischemia (P=0.07) and blood loss (P=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: RTB does not increase the risk of surgical complications of PN and may reduce the risk of small renal masses overtreatment.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Biópsia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Isquemia Quente
2.
Curr Urol Rep ; 22(9): 46, 2021 Sep 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34487255

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The use of renal tumor biopsy (RTB) for small renal masses (SRMs) in daily practice, although safe and accurate, is unusual. Considering the large number of benign tumors in patients with renal masses < 4 cm, some patients with benign tumors are directly referred for surgery instead. This study aimed to report the diagnostic rates of RTB, determine the concordance with surgical pathology, and assess the number of procedures that could have been avoided. We retrospectively studied 255 patients who underwent RTB at our institution in 2010-2019. Of them, 73 were excluded from the analysis (exclusion criteria: > 4 cm, cystic lesion, missing data). The remaining 182 with undetermined SRMs ≤ 4 cm underwent RTB under computed tomography guidance. RECENT FINDINGS: Biopsies were diagnostic in 154/182 (84.6%) cases. Of the non-diagnostic biopsies, 11 were diagnostic when repeated. When RTB was performed of all undetermined SRMs, active treatment (surgery or cryotherapy) was avoided in 50/182 patients (27.5%) because of a benign diagnosis, while 9/182 patients (4.9%) underwent surveillance after a shared multidisciplinary decision. The overall diagnostic rate was 90.6%. All adverse events (approximately 4%) were Clavien-Dindo grade I and did not require active treatment. RTB histology results and nuclear grade were highly concordant with the final pathology (96% and 86.6%, respectively). On univariate logistic regression analysis, male sex was the only contributing factor of diagnostic biopsy. RTB of SRMs should be performed more frequently as part of a multidisciplinary decision-making process since it avoided unnecessary surgical treatment in 1 of 3 patients in our institution.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Biópsia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Nefrectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Br J Surg ; 104(10): 1346-1354, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493483

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal conduit necrosis following oesophagectomy is a rare but life-threatening complication. The present study aimed to assess the impact of coeliac axis stenosis on outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. METHODS: The study included consecutive patients who had an Ivor Lewis procedure with curative intent for middle- and lower-third oesophageal cancer at two tertiary referral centres. All patients underwent preoperative multidetector CT with arterial phase to detect coeliac axis stenosis. The coeliac artery was classified as normal, with extrinsic stenosis due to a median arcuate ligament or with intrinsic stenosis caused by atherosclerosis. RESULTS: Some 481 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis procedure. Of these, ten (2·1 per cent) developed oesophageal conduit necrosis after surgery. Coeliac artery evaluation revealed a completely normal artery in 431 patients (91·5 per cent) in the group without conduit necrosis and in one (10 per cent) with necrosis (P < 0·001). Extrinsic stenosis of the coeliac artery due to a median arcuate ligament was found in two patients (0·4 per cent) without conduit necrosis and five (50 per cent) with necrosis (P < 0·001). Intrinsic stenosis of the coeliac artery was found in 11 (2·3 per cent) and eight (80 per cent) patients respectively (P < 0·001). Eight patients without (1·7 per cent) and five (50 per cent) with conduit necrosis had a single and thin left gastric artery (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that oesophageal conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy for cancer may be due to pre-existing coeliac axis stenosis.


Assuntos
Artéria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Celíaca/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Idoso , Constrição Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Esofagectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores , Necrose/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Actas urol. esp ; 40(10): 608-614, dic. 2016. tab, ilus, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-158320

RESUMO

Objetivos: Reportamos nuestra experiencia inicial en el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata (PCa) con ultrasonido focalizado de alta intensidad (HIFU) utilizando el dispositivo Focal-One(R). Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de datos recogidos prospectivamente. Entre junio de 2014 y octubre de 2015, 85 pacientes recibieron tratamiento HIFU (focal/total), para PCa localizado. La localización preoperatoria del tumor fue realizada con resonancia magnética multiparamétrica (mpMRI) y biopsias prostáticas mediante mapeo transperineal. El tratamiento fue realizado utilizando el dispositivo Focal-One(R)® bajo anestesia general. Seguimiento oncológico: medición del PSA y biopsia control con mpMRI según protocolo. Los resultados funcionales fueron evaluados mediante cuestionarios validados y las complicaciones reportadas utilizando la clasificación Clavien. Resultados: La mediana de PSA fue 7,79ng/ml (6,32-9,16) con una mediana de volumen prostático de 38cc (33-49,75). El tratamiento fue focal y total en 64 y 21 pacientes respectivamente. Diez pacientes recibieron tratamiento de rescate. La tasa de complicaciones fue del 15%, todas Clavien 2. La estancia hospitalaria media fue 1,8 días (0-7) y la sonda vesical fue retirada el día 2 (1-6). La media de reducción porcentual del PSA fue 54%. La mediana de seguimiento fue 3 meses (2-8). Resultados funcionales: todos los pacientes estuvieron continentes a los 3 meses y la potencia se mantuvo en el 83% de los previamente potentes. Conclusiones: El tratamiento HIFU Focal-One(R) es un procedimiento seguro con pocas complicaciones. Los resultados funcionales no reportan casos de incontinencia y la función sexual se mantuvo en el 83%


Objective: We report our initial experience in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using the Focal-One(R) device. Material and methods: Retrospective review of the prospectively populated database. Between June 2014 to October 2015, 85 patients underwent HIFU (focal/whole-gland) treatment for localized PCa. Preoperative cancer localization was done with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal mapping biopsies. Treatment was carried out using the Focal-One(R) device under general anesthesia. Oncological follow-up: PSA measurement and control biopsy with mpMRI according to protocol. Questionnaire-based functional outcome assessment was done. Complications were reported using Clavien classification. Results: The median PSA was 7.79ng/ml (IQR 6.32-9.16), with a median prostate volume of 38cc (IQR: 33-49.75). Focal and whole-gland therapy was performed in 64 and 21 patients respectively. Ten patients received salvage HIFU. Complications were encountered in 15% of cases, all Clavien 2 graded. Mean hospital stay was 1.8 days (0-7) and bladder catheter was removed on day 2 (1-6). Mean percentage reduction of PSA was 54%. Median follow-up was 3 months (IQR: 2-8). Functional outcomes: All patients were continents at 3 months and potency was maintained in 83% of the preoperatively potent. Conclusions: Focal-One(R) HIFU treatment appears to be a safe procedure with few complications. Functional outcomes proved no urinary incontinence and sexual function were maintained in 83%


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análise , Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade/instrumentação , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Indicadores de Morbimortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Anestesia Geral , Crioterapia/métodos
6.
Actas Urol Esp ; 40(10): 608-614, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27543259

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We report our initial experience in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using the Focal-One® device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of the prospectively populated database. Between June 2014 to October 2015, 85 patients underwent HIFU (focal/whole-gland) treatment for localized PCa. Preoperative cancer localization was done with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal mapping biopsies. Treatment was carried out using the Focal-One® device under general anesthesia. Oncological follow-up: PSA measurement and control biopsy with mpMRI according to protocol. Questionnaire-based functional outcome assessment was done. Complications were reported using Clavien classification. RESULTS: The median PSA was 7.79ng/ml (IQR 6.32-9.16), with a median prostate volume of 38cc (IQR: 33-49.75). Focal and whole-gland therapy was performed in 64 and 21 patients respectively. Ten patients received salvage HIFU. Complications were encountered in 15% of cases, all Clavien 2 graded. Mean hospital stay was 1.8 days (0-7) and bladder catheter was removed on day 2 (1-6). Mean percentage reduction of PSA was 54%. Median follow-up was 3 months (IQR: 2-8). Functional outcomes: All patients were continents at 3 months and potency was maintained in 83% of the preoperatively potent. CONCLUSIONS: Focal-One® HIFU treatment appears to be a safe procedure with few complications. Functional outcomes proved no urinary incontinence and sexual function were maintained in 83%.


Assuntos
Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade/instrumentação , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia/instrumentação , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Radiol ; 91(1 Pt 1): 37-44, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20212375

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the value of whole body CTA, as a complement to head CTA, in the management of brain-dead patients as potential organ donors. Materials and Methods. A total of 27 consecutive brain-dead patients admitted in a center authorized in the harvesting of organs between October 2006 and January 2008 were included. The imaging protocol used was the protocol recommended by the French Society of Neuroradiology, with additional arterial phase helical acquisition of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, and parenchymal phase helical acquisition of the abdomen and pelvis. The imaging findings were then correlated to the surgical reports after organ harvesting. RESULTS: CTA readily demonstrates tissue lesions, a contraindication to harvesting (14 cases, including one false positive), and anatomical variants of the vascular system (7 arterial variants and 3 venous variants) and liver (8 patients). CONCLUSION: CTA, the gold standard paraclinical examination for brain death assessment, allows, in a single examination, the identification of contraindications to organ harvesting that may modify the surgical approach and even avoid unnecessary mobilisation of the transplant team. It may also provide valuable preoperative evaluation by detecting anatomical variants of the liver and kidneys.


Assuntos
Angiografia/métodos , Morte Encefálica/diagnóstico , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Imagem Corporal Total/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artérias/anormalidades , Morte Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Contraindicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sobrevivência de Tecidos/fisiologia , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos , Tomografia Computadorizada Espiral/métodos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...